How to Defend Against a Domestic Violence Charge
As per the National Domestic Violence Hotline, over a third of women (35.6%) and a fourth of men (28.5%) living in the US have at one time in their lives undergone rape, physical abuse, and stalking from an intimate partner.
In America, a defendant needs to lay down a well-thought-out legal strategy in answer to charges of domestic violence. Domestic violence offenses carry serious charges with major consequences that could land an individual in prison or require protective orders. This offense could possibly damage one’s professional and personal liberty permanently.
Domestic violence cases require witness statements, physical evidence, and police reports to proceed through the judicial system. The defense team uses various tactics to break down the credibility of the evidence. Your legal counsel will simultaneously establish self-defense and prove false allegations and mistakes of the police investigation against the accused.
As a result of the high penalties of the offense, individuals who have been charged with such crimes should strive to understand their rights under the law and seek proper legal guidance to guarantee a fair proceeding.
Let’s learn the different strategies on how to beat a domestic violence case.
What Domestic Violence Charges Actually Cover
The term “domestic violence” serves as a legal term to define a specific type of criminal offense. The law covers all allegations except those that involve special relationships between victims and defendants since these cases require elevated punishment standards.
These relationships differ in meaning depending on the state statute, but they usually extend to spouses, former spouses, cohabitants, dating partners, and parents who share a child, along with their family members.
The significance of domestic violence categorization is that it triggers punishment above the penalties that would normally flow from a basic charge. The straightforward battery misdemeanor charges, which usually result in fines and probation, become an aggravated offense that requires mandatory jail time, mandatory attendance in a domestic violence intervention program, a federal law firearm ownership prohibition, and immigration penalties for non-citizens.
A person who has been convicted for a domestic violence misdemeanor under 18 U.S.C. Section 922(g)(9) faces permanent restrictions on their ability to possess firearms. The law states that all domestic violence misdemeanor offenders who were convicted in civilian or military courts face permanent firearm possession bans. This same prohibition applies to law enforcement officers and military personnel.
Mandatory Arrest Laws and What Happens at the Scene
Numerous states today maintain mandatory or preferred arrest policies concerning domestic abuse, but each state is unique in its own regard. When mandatory arrest laws are in place, any law enforcement entity who responds to a call involving domestic abuse must make an arrest if there is probable cause to believe an offense has been committed.
The alleged victim does not decide whether or not the arrest will proceed. If the police feel that there is probable cause, they can arrest a suspect. The case then goes to the prosecutor’s office, where a separate evaluation will be conducted for the evidence. The prosecutor will decide what to do in the case.
Many defendants automatically assume a case will be dismissed if the alleged victim recants or refuses to cooperate. In domestic violence cases, prosecutors use police reports together with 911 calls, pictures of injuries, medical reports, and the defendant’s own statements to build their cases without needing the alleged victim’s testimony.
In a few jurisdictions, prosecutors may still use earlier statements from the alleged victim in case that person subsequently retracts those statements. The question of whether these statements can be admitted will likely turn on the Confrontation Clause and whether the statements are considered “testimonial” according to the case Crawford v. Washington.
Emergency Protective Orders and No-Contact Conditions
There are cases where emergency protective orders are requested by police while the suspect is in custody, but usually the courts order no contact upon the initial appearance. Once the no-contact order is generated, it comes into effect immediately. These orders restrict the defendant from contacting the alleged victim or from staying or stepping anywhere near the victim’s residence or business.
Domestic violence protection orders can offer protection to victims from various forms of abusive treatments and actions. According to Santa Rosa domestic violence lawyer James Carroll, protective orders can prevent contact between parties and even allow criminal charges for the one receiving the order in case it is violated.
From the point of arrest onward, defense counsel must advise the client on these limitations and guarantee that the defendant strictly complies with the order.
The Main Defense Theories
Defense strategy in the case of domestic violence depends much on specific facts, the prosecution’s case strength, and the charge. There are many defenses that seem relevant in this situation.
One available defense is self-defense if the defendant can show that the force used in this case was necessary to protect themself from immediate harm brought about by the other party.
A number of states require a more general justification standard, which requires that the defendant reasonably believe in the necessity of using force and that the force used was in proportion to the perceived threat.
The misidentification defense is another option available against a charge of domestic violence. Authorities and the court have to look into the cause of the confrontation.
An alleged victim may have fabricated the situation or exaggerated it, which is a separate and distinct theory for the defense. The filing of those charges occurs within the context of contentious divorce proceedings, custody allegations, and other factors, and the motivation of these antagonists to fabricate serves as the key factor in dismantling the accusatory framework.
A lack of a qualifying relationship arises when the defendant challenges the assertion that a restraint, or any definition that characterizes the relationship between the parties, is necessary for domestic violence charges. A conviction on the simple charge, rather than a domestic violence offense, precludes a harsher collateral consequence, namely the federal firearms prohibition.
A lack of evidence occurs when the prosecution is unable to prove the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt. The fierce burden of proving the charge vests in the prosecution. In domestic violence cases, the accused is under no obligation to put on any evidence.
Collateral Consequences Beyond the Criminal Case
Federal housing programs may disqualify a person from eligibility in some cases, with the implications of those backward programs depending on the conviction and the applicable program rules. Professional licenses may be opened up to disciplinary processes, particularly in areas of healthcare, law, education, and financial services.
Child custody and parenting access agreements are directly influenced when state laws cause family courts to regard findings of domestic violence as a critical contributing factor in best interest determinations.
The consequences of any domestic violence conviction are severe, especially for non-citizens. A crime of domestic violence can render a non-citizen deportable under the federal statute 8 U.S.C. Section 1227(a)(2)(E).
Whether a state conviction falls within this category can be a matter only of the actual elements of the offense itself and the protected relationship. The federal immigration analysis must involve more than merely the generic state criminal label. Certain domestic violence offenses can also constitute aggravated felonies under federal immigration law.
A domestic violence conviction can bar any asylum claims, trigger mandatory detention of illegal aliens, and close off most avenues to obtaining relief under law for missed immigration deadlines.
The Importance of Early Counsel
Most criminal defendants suffer adverse effects from the decisions made in the immediate aftermath of an arrest. Knowing what to say to law enforcement on the scene or whether to give up statements during booking and how to respond to preliminary plea offers from a prosecuting attorney could make an impact on the case results.
Staying quiet by virtue of the right to have an attorney present can prevent the prosecution from obtaining key evidence.
MORE ABOUT HAUNTING
Haunting is a resource for immersive theater and horror fans in Los Angeles and across the world, promoting art and community. Want to help us reach even more people, and get some cool perks and experiences? For as little as $1 a month, you can join our Patreon and help us keep bringing content to life.
If you like the above article and want to find more like it, make sure to join our community. If Facebook is your favorite, follow us there and become a part of our groups for Immersive Horror fans and/or Immersive creators. We’re active on Instagram, posting evocative imagery and informative stories to promote our reviews and recollections; follow us there. You can even find us on twitter; click here to follow. And subscribe to our event calendar to get emails for all or specific events (look for the link right under the calendar)!




No Comments